Discussion:
[xiph-rtp] Q: vorbi-rtp-05 spec par. 2.3 Payload data.
Arjan Knepper
2006-01-30 10:41:03 UTC
Permalink
We are currently using the 05 spec in a project where one party builds a
sender an another builds the receiver.
We had a discussion going on about the byte order of the vorbis-data 2
octet "length" field preceding the vorbis-data. Should this field be
Little Endian or Big Endian?

Thanks,

Arjan Knepper
Luca Barbato
2006-01-30 11:45:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Arjan Knepper
We are currently using the 05 spec in a project where one party builds a
sender an another builds the receiver.
We had a discussion going on about the byte order of the vorbis-data 2
octet "length" field preceding the vorbis-data. Should this field be
Little Endian or Big Endian?
If not otherwise stated everything is network order (Big Endian so),
I'll update the current spec to keep this point clear.
I'd suggest you to read the current draft in the xiph svn

http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/vorbis/doc/draft-ietf-avt-vorbis-rtp-00.xml

And have a look at the current reference implementation

http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/xiph-rtp/

It should reflect the current spec (beside a timescale detail I have yet
to commit)

I hope it helps

lu
Arjan Knepper
2006-01-30 13:13:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Luca Barbato
Post by Arjan Knepper
We are currently using the 05 spec in a project where one party
builds a sender an another builds the receiver.
We had a discussion going on about the byte order of the vorbis-data
2 octet "length" field preceding the vorbis-data. Should this field
be Little Endian or Big Endian?
If not otherwise stated everything is network order (Big Endian so),
I'll update the current spec to keep this point clear.
I'd suggest you to read the current draft in the xiph svn
http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/vorbis/doc/draft-ietf-avt-vorbis-rtp-00.xml
And have a look at the current reference implementation
http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/xiph-rtp/
Thanks for the pointers to the current draft and ref impl.
Post by Luca Barbato
It should reflect the current spec (beside a timescale detail I have
yet to commit)
I hope it helps
Yes is does.

Thanks,
Arjan

Loading...